In the past few months I have seen two young players who were produced by Plymouth Argyle Centre of Excellence play for Wales U18′s, one player scored in the FA cup final and several players have made a few appearances in professional football at such a tender age. Furthermore, this week two players produced by PAFC played for England U18’s and one of them scored. Now Plymouth and Cornwall are not renowned for producing players. In fact I am struggling to think of a few now. I know that Plymouth Argyle FC have always had talented staff. However, when Mike Pejic, Gordon Bennett and Allan Evans took charge I feel they gave us direction. It does not surprise me that many players from the Centre of Excellence are doing well. Mike Pejic instilled in the club a forward thinking philosophy and educated the staff how they should teach the players and the style he wanted the teams to play. He was not concerned about results. Instead, his aim was to develop individuals. Furthermore, he wanted us to produce mavericks that had the ability to change a game.
When I first joined Plymouth as the U10′s assistant coach I could not believe my luck. I had attended many Continues Professional Development days prior to joining Plymouth Argyle. However, I had never seen a coach like Mike Pejic. He was a great teacher of the game and a very forward thinking coach. When I attended my first CPD delivered by Mike I just kept thinking that I knew very little about the game. Therefore, when I had a day off university I would travel up to Plymouth and spend the day observing him coaching the U18′s. Also, during lunch I would ask Mike many questions and listen to him attentively. What I see FC Barcelona doing now is what Mike educated us how he wanted his players to play. For instance, he wanted the keeper to be a sweeper and play from the back. He encouraged the full backs to push up high and did not care if the Central Defenders were left exposed as it would teach them to learn how to deal with 1v1 situations. He wanted a CD when possible to drive with the ball and push into the midfield so there was an overload of attackers. Furthermore, he taught the players to be fluid in their movement when they had possession of the ball.
Mike wanted our players to be able to deal with the ball in any area of the pitch. He did not condone players kicking the ball into touch. Instead, he wanted them to ‘take care’ of the ball. Even if a defender was under pressure he wanted to see him protect the ball instead of giving the opposition a throwing. He educated the players many ways of how to be ‘cute’ on the ball so they could maintain possession. The aim was each game for our teams to have 60 – 70% possession. However, this does not mean they just kept possession without hurting the opposition. We had to teach our players how to be positive when in possession of the ball. Mike wanted our players to be creative. Thus, it was essential we created an environment so our players had the freedom to express themselves.
When watching the U18’s games I was often impressed how patient his team were on the ball and how they would suddenly change the pace of the game. Moreover, they were very creative in the final third. There was one game where they must have had 70% possession. However, during the game Mike demanded lots from the players by constantly asking questions of them. For instance, he would get the player in the ‘hole’ to think where to position himself when defending so when PAFC won possession he was in a position to hurt the opposition. The players had no chance to switch off the whole game. However, he did not ‘tell’ them what to do and the players were encouraged to express themselves. Mike just ensured that they were always ‘thinking’ two to three phases ahead.
His half-time team talk in this particular game was rather unorthodox as he kept the players on the pitch and did shadow play with them. He asked each player questions on how they could improve their performance. He provided them ideas by showing ‘pictures’ and then made them practice what he just showed them. It was a fascinating team talk and was wonderful to watch the players practice in the second half what he had demonstrated to them at half time.
Mike’s training sessions were very creative and he provided each individual ‘fine’ detail on how they could improve their performance. For instance, he did many sessions where they the players would receive the ball in a tight area so they had to take care of the defender and the ball. Additionally, the players would have to think of things such as where and how to take their touch, how to take a player or two out of the game, which foot to pass to etc.. He would show the players ‘pictures’ throughout the session and had the ability to make the complicated sound incredibly simple. It was the detail he provided and how he transferred his knowledge to the players that impressed me most. He would teach his players techniques that many coaches would not even think about.
I remember him delivering a session before an FA youth cup game against West Ham FC and during the training game he provided the players different scenarios. Together they worked out how to combat each situation. For instance, West Ham had wide player who was very quick and skilful. Therefore, Mike got the players thinking how they could prevent him from receiving the ball. They had a great footballing education that night and when they played against West Ham FC they did extremely well. The wide player did not play to his usual standards as he could not get on the ball. Plymouth managed to compete with them during the 90 minutes and the game went into extra time. Unfortunately, West ham scored in extra time and knocked them out of the cup. However, I think it was remarkable that he took them so far in the cup and they were able to compete with academy sides such West Ham FC. Furthermore, they tried to play attractive football in every game.
Mike also demanded a lot from us coaches and if we did not have a good performance he would ask questions of us and if we showed signs of complacency Mike became very strict. Thus, our minds could not be ‘still’. We had to constantly deliver effective sessions and be open-minded to learn more. I have to thank Mike for this as I am now a student of the game looking for the ‘fine’ detail to improve an individual’s performance even if it is by 1 %. I still have lots to learn. However, now I am coaching every day of the week working with children from 2-18 sometimes up to six hours a day I have started to identify more of what he expected from me. For instance, I have started reflecting more on what I should teach each age group and how I should communicate to each individual. Moreover, I am watching games differently now and seeing little bits of detail each game I watch which he tried educating us.
I strongly believe we need more teachers of the game like Mike Pejic in the UK to have a chance of producing individuals who can deal with the ball in any area of the pitch and make effective decisions. If we had more teachers of the game like Mike I am sure we would start producing players that compare to our foreign counterparts. The coaches at Plymouth Argyle FC are doing great work. But I am sure they would all state how much they appreciated Mike’s expertise. I certainly have and even though I have not seen him for two years I am still learning from him now as he has made me think so deeply about the game. I have a long way to go in my development as a coach and I have so much I want to achieve. However, I know for a fact if it was not for Mike I would not have been given the opportunity to coach the U16’s at PAFC and be working as full-time coach now.